- June 2015
- President’s Notes
- Congress Extends H-2A Period
- Theos Family Reaching Niche Lamb Market
- Market Report
- Australian Wool Market Rallied; U.S. Gains
- USDA Begins Releasing Grass Fed Report
- Clark Willis Obituary
- Region IV Bighorn Plan Implemented in Utah
- Western Lawmakers Team to De-List Wolves
- ASI Photo Contest
- ASI Supports COOL For Lamb
- Battle Not Over in Sage Grouse Fight
- Livestock Mandatory Reporting
- No Grazing This Summer
- Separate Efforts: Scrapie Eradication Program and the Animal Disease Traceability Program
- Lamb Producers Look to Ethnic Groups
- Study Explores Disease in Grand Canyon Bighorns
- Sheep News In Brief
ASI Supports COOL for Lamb; Lauds ‘Consistency’
The House Agriculture Committee voted 38-6 to repeal a country- of-origin labeling (COOL) law for beef, pork and poultry, while leaving the requirements in place for lamb.
This action came just two days after the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled against parts of the law. The labels tell consumers where the meat is born, raised and slaughtered. The WTO ruled May 18 that the U.S. labels put Canadian and Mexican livestock at a disadvantage.
House Agriculture Committee Chairman Mike Conaway (Texas) has long backed the meat industry’s call for repeal. Along with several of his colleagues, he introduced the legislation to repeal the labeling requirements hours after the WTO decision. He said the bill is a “targeted” response.
The American Sheep Industry Association (ASI) responded to Conaway’s introduction of the bill, H.R. 2393, with a letter of endorsement and appreciation for allowing the labeling of lamb to continue.
ASI policy has strongly supported the required identification of lamb for nearly 25 years and lamb-promotion organizations have emphasized American lamb in national advertising since the 1960s. ASI Executive Director Peter Orwick applauded the Chairman’s approach.
“This is consistent with that of the Agriculture Committee leaders’ debate on COOL during the Farm Bill nearly two years ago,” Orwick said.
All but six of the committee’s Democrats supported the bill. Rep. Collin Peterson (Minn.), the panel’s top Democrat and a longtime supporter of the labeling, was one of the few to vote against it. He said there is still time to find a “workable North American solution.”
“I think repealing it is premature,” said Peterson, adding that “we should take a serious look at the labeling requirements that are in place in 60 other countries.”
Peterson further noted that “there are still several steps that have to occur” before tariff retaliation can take place. Months could pass, and U.S., Mexican and Canadian officials could conceivably strike a deal short of outright repeal of the labeling requirement.
On the Senate side, Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts (Kan.) also has said he will move quickly to respond to the WTO ruling, but he has yet to introduce a bill.