Choosing the winner of an essay contest about the ethics of eating meat must have been difficult for the five hand-picked men chosen as judges for The New York Times' contest. That's because those men are either vegetarians or opposed to the modern practices of raising livestock. But, true to their obligation, choose a winner they did - though the author of the winning essay admits he's a "vegetarian who returned to meat-eating."
Jay Bost wrote the winning entry, and he told The Times he has been "a farmworker, plant geek, agroecologist and foodie for the past 20 years." He teaches at Warren Wilson College in Swannanoa, N.C., and plans to head to Hawaii next year for a Ph.D. in tropical plant and soil science. His deepest interest is in agrobiodiversity.
The contest was initiated by The Times' ethicist, Ariel Kaminer, who also picked what she calls "some of the strongest ethical critics of meat, or at least of the way we consume it" - Mark Bittman, Jonathan Safran Foer, Andrew Light, Michael Pollan and Peter Singer.
In a column in Sunday's paper, Kaminer acknowledged the contest drew plenty of heat from both sides of the ethical argument. "Immediately, incensed blog posts, e-mails, radio broadcasts and tweets started appearing," Kaminer wrote. "Carnivores condemned the contest as anti-meat propaganda. Vegans condemned the contest as pro-meat propaganda. Yet others said that I was trying to impose a single moral code; they were matched by those who said I was abetting moral anarchy. People dismissed the contest as either too elitist or too populist."
The contest drew about 3,000 entries, and the judges considered 29 semi-finalists. Almost 17,000 people voted online for their favorite essay among the six finalists.
Reprinted in part from Drovers Cattle Network