The Obama Administration issued final responses this week denying petitions to increase the grazing fee on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and U.S. Forest Service (USFS) grazing allotments. The decision was made in response to the petitions and a lawsuit filed by five environmental activist groups asking the government to address the grazing-fee formula and adjust the fee in order to, in their words, "cover the costs of the federal grazing program."
The responses, issued by BLM Director Bob Abbey and USFS Deputy Chief Joel Holtrop, outlined the administration's decisions to deny the petitions, citing more pressing demands on the agencies' resources. Abbey also noted that in his conversations with members of Congress and congressional staff regarding budgetary restrictions for the Department of the Interior and the BLM, increasing the grazing fee has not been discussed.
Dustin Van Liew, executive director of the Public Lands Council, said the current grazing-fee formula is fair and accurately reflects current private grazing land lease rates, beef cattle prices and the cost of livestock production.
"We are glad the Administration has recognized the equitability of the fee and the importance of the viability of federal lands ranching to western rural economies and the entire cattle and sheep industries," Van Liew said.
While some claim ranchers who graze livestock on public land pay an artificially low price, Van Liew said federal lands ranchers actually pay much more than just the fee itself.
"When one takes into account the hidden costs of range improvements and maintenance, managing on rocky and less productive terrain and the cost of complying with various government regulations, the current grazing fee is actually relatively high," Van Liew said.
The American Sheep Industry Association was an intervenor in this case.