NAHMS Sheep 2011 Study
The NAHMS Sheep 2011 study was conducted in 22 of the Nation’s major sheepproducing States. The study provides participants, stakeholders, and the industry with valuable information representing 70.1 percent of U.S. farms with ewes and 85.5 percent of the U.S. ewe inventory (NASS 2007 Census of Agriculture).
Part 1: Reference of Sheep Management Practices in the United States, 2011
Items of Note
Population estimates and operator experience
Sheep breeds in the United States can be categorized by purpose, fi ber type, and face color. Black- or nonwhite-faced breeds include Suffolk, Hampshire, Shropshire, Oxford, and Southdown. These breeds are often considered meat producers, while white-faced breeds are more often used for wool production. Because each sheep breed offers superiority in some trait, producers often blend the breeds to gain the superior characteristics of each breed in offspring. These offspring are used to attain the phenotypic requirements of their operation’s type and geographical conditions. While the highest percentage of operations (44.7 percent) had black-faced wool breeds, the highest percentage of sheep and lambs (41.7 percent) were in the white-faced breed category. Sheep are a multiuse species. For example, 81.6 percent of operations raised sheep for meat, 26.5 percent for seed or breeding stock, 15.8 percent for wool, and nearly 32.6 percent of operations raised sheep for more than one reason. When rapid means of communication with producers is important, it can be helpful to work with national or State industry organizations to promulgate necessary information. Over one-fifth of producers (22.9 percent) belonged to a national sheep organization, and almost one-third (29.0 percent) belonged to a State or local sheep industry association or club. These percentages vary by size of operation and by operation type.
Flock and individual animal identifi cation (ID) are important tools used to reduce disease and increase productivity on U.S. sheep operations. Almost 9 of 10 operations (88.6 percent) used some form of individual ID for their sheep. The most commonly used form of either individual or fl ock ID was the free Scrapie Program ear tag.
With the increase of smaller operations, nontraditional marketing methods, and improved reproductive techniques, more operations have the ability to lamb during the season that best suits their customers’ needs. The highest percentage of lambs were born from February through May, which allows producers to make the most use of available forage. Spring lambing also coincides with natural breeding and lambing seasons, when ewes are likely to produce larger lamb crops. For operations that managed their sheep primarily on the open range, docking may be the fi rst time they view the sheep after lambing. At this time, lambs are tagged, castrated, docked, and vaccinated, and ewes are examined to ensure health and fecundity. Overall, 80.5 percent of lambs born alive were docked. Nearly 7 of 10 operations castrated ram lambs at an average age of 23.4 days, and more than 3 of 10 operations castrated ram lambs in the fi rst 7 days of age.
Part II: Reference of Sheep Management Practices in the United States, 2011
Items of Note
The largest marketing component of the sheep industry is the sale of lambs. Overall, the majority of sheep operations with 20 or more ewes (52.5 percent) sold their lambs at auction markets or sale barns. Large operations (500 or more ewes) are the exception. Marketing on large operations is more diverse compared with the other operation sizes. For example, a relatively equal percentage of large operations sold lambs directly to slaughter (24.4 percent), directly to feedlots (20.8 percent), at auction or sale barns (29.6 percent), or directly to buyer/dealers (29.0 percent). Marketing characteristics also varied by region. In the Central and East regions the majority of operations sold lambs at auction or sale barns (58.0 and 52.0 percent, respectively), while in the West region similar percentages of operations sold lambs directly to consumers (25.1 percent), directly to another operation (21.3 percent), at auction or sale barn (22.5 percent), and directly to buyer/dealers (23.2 percent). Not surprisingly, lamb marketing also varied by flock type. The majority of fenced-range (59.4 percent), pasture (51.3 percent), and dry lot/feedlot (51.8 percent) operations sold lambs at auctions or sale barns, while similar percentages of herded/open-range operations sold lambs directly to slaughter (22.9 percent), directly to feedlots (27.2 percent), and directly to buyer/dealers (25.3 percent). Overall, 75.3 percent of lambs were sold in the United States during 2010. Of those, 27.3 percent were sold at auction/sale barn, 24.9 percent were sold directly to slaughter, and 17.3 percent were sold directly to buyer/dealers. For all operations, the majority of cull sheep sold (60.4 percent) were sold at auction markets or sale barns. The majority of breeding and “other” sheep (51.7 percent) were sold directly to another operation. The primary reason for culling rams and ewes was old age. The average age at which rams and ewes were culled was 4.9 and 6.3 years, respectively. Rams and ewes on large operations were slightly older when culled than those on smaller operations.
Predator losses have a substantial economic impact on U.S. sheep operations. Overall, coyotes caused the highest percentage of predator losses (51.8 percent), but predator predominance varies by geographic location, fl ock size, and fl ock type. For example, mountain lions, cougars, or pumas were a cause of sheep loss on 26.8 percent of operations in the West region but on only 1.3 percent of operations in the East region. Dogs were a cause of sheep loss on 39.3 percent of very small operations (fewer than 20 ewes), while only 4.1 percent of large operations reported predation due to dogs. Death-loss evaluations in 1994, 1999, 2004, and 2009 have shown lamb death loss ranged from 9.5 to 10.8 percent of lambs born. In 2010, lamb death loss for all operations was 11.2 percent of lambs born. In 1994, 1999, 2004, and 2009, sheep death loss ranged from 5.6 to 6.5 percent. In 2010, sheep death loss for all operations was 5.0 percent of adult sheep inventory on January 1, 2011. Predator losses were highest in the Central region, where 37.9 percent of operations lost lambs and 22.5 percent lost sheep due to predation in 2010. Nonpredator losses accounted for 3.8 percent of sheep lost on 47.2 percent of all operations during 2010.
Almost one-fourth of operations (23.9 percent) had a private veterinarian visit for any sheep-related reason during 2010. For operations that did not use a veterinarian during 2010, 68.9 percent indicated they had no health-related problems; 5.1 percent reported there was no veterinarian with sheep experience available; and 11.8 percent claimed veterinarian visits were too expensive.
Overall, 80.2 percent of operations with 20 or more ewes sheared lambs and sheep during 2010. A hired individual was used to shear sheep on 50.9 percent of these operations, while 29.2 percent contracted with a shearing crew, and 26.2 percent used employees or the sheep owner to shear.
NAHMA Sheep 2001 Study
Part I: Reference of Sheep Management in the United States, 2001
This 88-page report contains results from NAHMS’ second national sheep study and was designed to provide both participants and the industry with information the U.S. sheep flock on operations with one or more sheep.
The table of contents includes the following sections:
Part II: Reference of Sheep Health in the United States
This 128-page report contains results from a nation-wide APHIS study, conducted in 2001. The table of contents includes the following sections:
Part III: Lambing Practices, Spring 2001
This 42-page report contains results from the nation-wide APHIS study, conducted in 2001. The table of contents includes the following sections:
Highlights of NAHMS Sheep 2001: Parts II and III
This 2-page summary of the aforementioned reports contains the major findings of each. Reports II and III should be reviewed if further detail is required.